I was intrigued to catch sight of a headline on the Guardian Environment site that read "Riding-hoods: how to beat the rain". Cycle capes, I thought, the original hi-vis garment.
My ageing mind clawed its way back to schooldays cycling to and from the daily drudge, protected from the incessant downpours (even then!) by the bright yellow oilskin one-piece, cleverly designed to cover the handlebars so your arms and hands were covered and there was just the spray from the road to soak you from the bottom up!








If you could bottle the hot air being generated in the row about gas, even George Osborne would probably admit defeat: the energy-from-waste produced would obviate the need for any other source completely. On Thursday the Committee on Climate Change published a letter to Ed Davey, the Secretary of State at DECC, expressing concern at a statement regarding the role of gas in future energy generation. In particular, it pointed out that there is a statutory requirement to meet carbon targets by 2030. The letter was pointedly copied to the Prime Minister, Deputy Prime Minister and the Chancellor himself, who is widely suspected of favouring shifting the goalposts on gas.
A month or so ago this column carried a report on the Renewables Obligation Banding Review, which was somewhat less than enthusiastic about some biomass and biofuels options – in particular where crops are being grown for fuel instead of food. This week no less a body than food giant Nestlé threw its weight behind the argument, warning that US and EU biofuel targets could trigger a world food crisis, cutting production and driving up prices at a time when the US in particular is experiencing its worst drought in decades.